Alan Grochowski, Sr.: The TCPA Plaintiff Continuing the Fight Against QuoteWizard’s Lead-Gen Machine
Alan Grochowski, Sr. is a TCPA class action plaintiff who filed suit against QuoteWizard.com, LLC, the same company that paid $5 million to settle the Mantha case and later $19 million to resolve related claims. Unlike the serial litigators profiled elsewhere in this series (Dobronski, Callier, Ewing, Sheldon, Hastings), Grochowski is not a high-volume filer. He is not a professional plaintiff. He is not a fake-name user or a convicted stalker. He is a consumer who allegedly received unwanted prerecorded calls and text messages from QuoteWizard despite his number being on the National Do Not Call Registry.
The case, Grochowski v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC (Case No. 9:24-cv-80379), was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida at the beginning of 2024. Grochowski seeks to represent a class of consumers who received similar unlawful communications. The case is closely linked to the landmark Mantha v. QuoteWizard litigation, and many of the core legal arguments Grochowski used regarding “bad leads” have been validated by the outcome of that parallel litigation.
Legal commentators, defense firms, and consumer advocates have followed Grochowski v. QuoteWizard because it demonstrates that lead-generation companies cannot simply settle one case and assume they are safe; they must ensure compliance across all their marketing practices. The case also highlights a critical trend where plaintiffs are successfully bypassing technical arguments about dialing hardware by focusing on the National Do Not Call Registry and the use of prerecorded voices, both of which offer a clearer path to victory in modern TCPA litigation.
Who Is Alan Grochowski, Sr.? A Florida Consumer, Not a Serial Litigator
Alan Grochowski, Sr. is a Florida resident who became a named plaintiff in a TCPA class action against QuoteWizard.com, LLC. Unlike the professional plaintiffs profiled elsewhere, Grochowski does not have a history of dozens of lawsuits or questionable litigation tactics.
What We Know About Grochowski
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Alan Grochowski, Sr. |
| Location | Florida (Southern District of Florida) |
| Role | Proposed class representative |
| Number of TCPA Cases | 1 major case (QuoteWizard) |
| Legal Training | None known |
| Manufactured Claims | No, alleged genuine unwanted calls |
The Key Distinction From Serial Litigators
| Comparison | Alan Grochowski, Sr. | Serial Litigators (Dobronski, Callier, Ewing, Sheldon, Hastings) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of TCPA Cases | 1 major case | 15–60+ cases |
| High-Volume Filing | No | Yes |
| Fake Names Used | No | Yes (“Marvin Taeese”) |
| Manufactured Claims | No | Yes |
| Criminal History | None | Some have stalking convictions |
| Judicial Warnings | None | Multiple |
| Fraud Counterclaims | None | Yes (Hastings) |
What this reveals: Alan Grochowski, Sr. is an ordinary consumer, a Florida resident who received unwanted prerecorded calls and text messages and decided to take legal action. He is not running a litigation enterprise. He is not filing dozens of lawsuits. He is, by all appearances, a legitimate plaintiff with a genuine grievance.
The Case: Grochowski v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC
Alan Grochowski, Sr. filed a class action lawsuit against QuoteWizard.com, LLC a company that helps insurance agents find customers, alleging violations of the TCPA. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:24-cv-80379).
Case Overview
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida |
| Filing Date | Early 2024 |
| Plaintiff | Alan Grochowski, Sr. |
| Defendant | QuoteWizard.com, LLC |
| Key Issues | National Do Not Call Registry violations, prerecorded call violations |
| Status | Active (Florida plaintiff’s claims allowed to proceed) |
The Allegations
The Grochowski lawsuit focuses on two primary TCPA violations:
| Violation | Details |
|---|---|
| National Do Not Call Registry (DNCR) | Grochowski alleges that QuoteWizard called people whose numbers were on the DNCR without valid consent. |
| Prerecorded Messages | QuoteWizard allegedly used prerecorded voices to send marketing messages without prior express written consent. |
The “Drips” Platform Focus
Grochowski’s pattern involves a technical focus on the “Drips” platform, a conversational SMS tool. He argues that even if a communication appears conversational, it remains an automated marketing system governed by the TCPA when consent was not “express and written.”
The Proposed Classes
Grochowski seeks certification of two classes:
| Class | Definition |
|---|---|
| Robocall Class | Consumers who received one or more prerecorded calls from or on behalf of QuoteWizard within four years prior to filing |
| DNCR Class | Consumers whose residential numbers were on the National Do Not Call Registry for at least 31 days but received more than one solicitation within a 12-month period |
The Jurisdictional Ruling: Florida Plaintiffs Only
In a significant early ruling, the court dismissed non-Florida plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction but allowed Grochowski’s Florida-based claims to proceed.
| Ruling | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Non-Florida Plaintiffs | Dismissed |
| Florida Plaintiff (Grochowski) | Claims allowed to proceed |
Why this matters: The ruling highlights the importance of jurisdiction in TCPA class actions. While QuoteWizard succeeded in narrowing the scope of the case geographically, the core Florida claims survived.
The Connection to the Mantha Litigation
The Grochowski case is closely linked to Mantha v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC, the landmark litigation in which Joseph Mantha rejected a $100,000 personal settlement to protect the class.
How the Cases Are Connected
| Connection | Details |
|---|---|
| Same Defendant | Both cases target QuoteWizard.com, LLC |
| Similar Allegations | Both involve unlawful telemarketing communications |
| Lead-Gen Issues | Both challenge purchased third-party leads |
| Consent Disclosures | Both allege inadequate consent disclosures |
The “Mantha Intersection”
Though Grochowski is a different lead plaintiff, the Mantha settlement finalized in 2025 effectively resolved portions of the text-message claims involving QuoteWizard. The company ultimately paid approximately $19 million to resolve related claims involving unsolicited communications to DNC-registered numbers.
Many of the arguments Grochowski advances regarding defective lead-generation practices were reinforced by the outcome of the Mantha litigation.
The “Lead-Gen Meltdown”: QuoteWizard’s Growing Liability
Grochowski’s litigation has been cited in broader discussions about “lead-gen meltdowns”, situations where companies relying on purchased leads face escalating TCPA exposure because consent records are defective or unverifiable.
QuoteWizard’s Liability Timeline
| Case | Outcome | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Mantha v. QuoteWizard | Settlement (texts) | $5,000,000 |
| Related DNCR/Text Claims | Settlement | $19,000,000 |
| Grochowski v. QuoteWizard | Ongoing | Potential additional exposure |
The bottom line: QuoteWizard’s lead-generation practices have already cost the company tens of millions of dollars, and Grochowski’s case could increase that exposure further.
The “Lead-Gen” Defense Under Scrutiny
QuoteWizard’s defense centers on the argument that it relied on consent obtained by third-party lead vendors.
Grochowski’s position is straightforward: he never gave QuoteWizard permission to contact him, and purchasing a lead does not create valid TCPA consent.
The likely implication following Mantha: companies purchasing leads remain responsible for ensuring valid consent exists. “I bought the lead” is not a complete defense.
Legal Stakes and Financial Exposure
Grochowski seeks statutory damages and injunctive relief on behalf of a proposed class.
| Damages | Amount |
|---|---|
| Standard TCPA Violation | $500 per call/text |
| Willful Violation | Up to $1,500 per call/text |
| Class-Wide Exposure | Potentially millions |
Even after prior settlements, QuoteWizard remains exposed to additional liability for prerecorded call and DNCR claims that were not fully resolved previously.
The “Drips” Platform and Modern TCPA Litigation
A major issue in the case is whether conversational SMS systems like Drips still qualify as automated communications regulated by the TCPA.
Grochowski argues that the content and consent process matter more than the underlying software architecture. Even if messages appear conversational, they remain actionable when sent without valid written consent.
This reflects a broader post-Facebook v. Duguid trend in TCPA litigation: plaintiffs increasingly focus on DNCR violations and prerecorded content rather than technical ATDS debates.
What the Grochowski Case Means for Businesses
| Lesson | Application |
|---|---|
| Verify Consent | Independently verify consent before contacting consumers |
| Respect the DNCR | Do not rely solely on vendor scrubbing |
| Be Transparent | Avoid deceptive sign-up practices |
| One Settlement Is Not Enough | Ongoing compliance matters |
| Written Consent Is Critical | Prerecorded marketing calls require express written consent |
How Grochowski Compares to Other Plaintiffs in This Series
| Comparison | Alan Grochowski, Sr. | Joseph Mantha | Serial Litigators |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of TCPA Cases | 1 | 1 | 15–60+ |
| High-Volume Filing | No | No | Yes |
| Fake Names Used | No | No | Yes |
| Manufactured Claims | No | No | Yes |
| Criminal History | None | None | Some |
| Judicial Warnings | None | None | Multiple |
| Case Outcome | Ongoing | $5M Settlement | Varies |
What makes Grochowski similar to Mantha: both appear to be legitimate consumer plaintiffs challenging the same lead-generation ecosystem.
What makes Grochowski different: his case focuses more heavily on prerecorded calls, DNCR claims, and conversational SMS technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Alan Grochowski, Sr.?
Alan Grochowski, Sr. is a Florida resident who filed a TCPA class action against QuoteWizard.com, LLC alleging unlawful prerecorded calls and National Do Not Call Registry violations.
Is Alan Grochowski, Sr. a serial litigator?
No. Unlike several high-volume TCPA plaintiffs profiled elsewhere, Grochowski appears to have filed only one major TCPA action.
What happened in Grochowski v. QuoteWizard?
Grochowski alleges that QuoteWizard contacted him using prerecorded marketing communications despite his number being on the National Do Not Call Registry.
What was the jurisdictional ruling?
The court dismissed non-Florida plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction but allowed Grochowski’s Florida-based claims to proceed.
How is Grochowski connected to the Mantha case?
Both cases target QuoteWizard’s lead-generation and consent practices. Many of the legal arguments advanced in Grochowski were reinforced by the Mantha litigation outcomes.
What is the “Drips” platform?
Drips is a conversational SMS platform used in automated marketing campaigns. Grochowski argues it remains subject to TCPA restrictions when consent is defective.
What damages is Grochowski seeking?
Statutory damages of $500–$1,500 per violation, along with injunctive relief and class-wide remedies.
Is Grochowski helping consumers?
Yes. Grochowski appears to be a legitimate consumer plaintiff seeking class-wide relief for allegedly unlawful telemarketing practices.
Final Thoughts: The Consumer Plaintiff in the Shadow of Mantha
Alan Grochowski, Sr. is not a serial litigator. He is not a professional plaintiff. He is not a fake-name user, a deceptive witness, or a high-volume filing machine. He is a Florida consumer who allegedly received unwanted prerecorded calls and text messages from QuoteWizard and chose to fight back.
His case represents the next phase of scrutiny facing the lead-generation industry. While Mantha established that purchased leads do not guarantee valid consent, Grochowski extends the fight into prerecorded calls, DNCR compliance, and conversational SMS technology.
The contrast with abusive serial litigators remains stark:
| Serial Litigators | Alan Grochowski, Sr. |
|---|---|
| File dozens of lawsuits | Filed one major case |
| Use fake identities | Uses real identity |
| Manufacture damages | Alleges genuine unwanted calls |
| Face fraud allegations | No fraud allegations |
| Seek personal leverage | Seeks class-wide relief |
As courts continue distinguishing legitimate consumer plaintiffs from abusive professional litigators, cases like Grochowski demonstrate the continuing role of the TCPA in protecting consumers from unwanted telemarketing practices.
Alan Grochowski, Sr. alleges he received unwanted prerecorded calls while listed on the National Do Not Call Registry. He sued. That is precisely the type of claim the TCPA was designed to address.
Sources & References
Primary Sources, Alan Grochowski, Sr. (Litigation)
- TCPAWorld, “NEW YEAR, NEW QUOTEWIZARD TCPA CLASS ACTION”
- Grochowski v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC, Case No. 9:24-cv-80379 (S.D. Fla.)
Secondary Sources, Legal Commentary
- Justia Docket
- CourtListener Docket
Related Cases
- Mantha v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC, No. 1:19-cv-12235 (D. Mass.)
Disclaimer
This article presents information based on publicly available court filings, legal commentary, media reporting, and judicial rulings. Unlike previous profiles in this series, Alan Grochowski, Sr. is not characterized as a serial litigator or professional plaintiff; he appears to be a legitimate consumer plaintiff pursuing class relief under the TCPA. This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
